Skip to main content

How to Do a Music Critique

Writing a music critique may seem overwhelming. All critiques are inherently subjective and personal honesty is important. On the other hand, the critique also needs to offer a true evaluation of the music and should not be skewed by your own personal bias. It is also important to keep in mind the needs and expectations of the people who will read your critique since they may make decisions based on your critique. Finally, you need to consider the intentions of the composers and musicians as well. Understanding all these factors will help you to create a critique that is balanced, honest and useful.

Step 1: Listen to the composer’s representative works. When possible listen to contrasting pieces from different styles. This will provide a framework to view the music that is being critiqued.

Step 2: Write down specific thoughts and observations while listening to the piece the first time. This step will document and clarify changes in perception while listening.

Step 3: Listen to the music to become familiar with the style. Attempt to categorize the music into a specific genre. Determine if it is classical, rock, jazz or an alternative style.

Step 4: Play the music a second time. Attempt to formulate specific opinions this time. Analyze the form of the piece by determining if it consists of repeated sections or is through-composed with no repetition. Take notes on the effectiveness of the composer’s choice of form.

Step 5: Evaluate the piece one final time to see if it has additional elements that you may have missed in the first two times. Answer questions that the reader may be interested in, such as how the melody fits the harmony. Describe the melody and how the instruments function in the music.

Step 6: Write an introduction. The introduction should give a general overview of the composer’s music, your initial impressions and a reason why the reader should or should not care about this composer.

Step 7: State your opinion from Step 4 in the next paragraph. Don't go into detail on each listening at this point, just state your overall opinion and observations about the music and the composer's output.

Step 8: Describe the process of listening to his music. If your opinion changed between the first and third listening, discuss how and why it changed. You don’t have to provide a positive review, but you should explain and defend your opinion with concrete ideas.

Step 9: Write a conclusion. Rather than summarizing how you felt about the music, talk about how the process of listening to this composer's music affected you -- negatively or positively.


  • Did you gain an appreciation for the composer even though you may not have liked the music?
  • Do you see a place for this music in relation to other music in the world?


Be original and avoid simply summarizing what you have already said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sunday Stories: The Power of Audiation in Music Composition

Happy Sunday! Today, let’s explore the transformative power of audiation in music composition and share an inspiring story about a composer who mastered this skill. Audiation, the ability to hear and understand music in your mind, is a crucial tool for composers, enabling them to bring their musical ideas to life with greater detail and precision. What is Audiation? Audiation is the process of hearing and comprehending music in your mind without any external sound. It is similar to thinking in a language, where you can understand and manipulate words and sentences internally.  For composers, audiation is an essential skill that allows them to imagine, develop, and refine their musical ideas before they are played or written down 1 . The Benefits of Audiation for Composers 1. Enhanced Musical Understanding Audiation helps composers develop a deeper understanding of music. By hearing and analyzing music internally, they can grasp the relationships between different musical elements, ...

Similarities of Classical and Baroque Music

Music has evolved through the centuries and undergone drastic changes. One of the most significant transitions was from the Baroque to the Classical period of music. In this paragraph, I will compare and contrast some of the main features of these two styles, such as ensembles, instrumentation, and counterpoint study. The Baroque and Classical periods of music have many similarities. While the style of music changed drastically, certain key elements remained the same between the two styles. Composers in the Classical period sought to simplify music and create clearly audible musical lines. In contrast, composers from the Baroque period were interested in creating complex and highly ornamented musical lines. The Baroque period occurs from approximately 1600 to 1750, and the Classical period extends from 1750 to 1820. Ensembles Ensembles are groups of musicians that perform together. Both the Baroque and the Classical period had similar types of ensembles, such as operas, orchestras, str...

List of Musical Techniques and Their Meanings

Musical techniques are the building blocks of any basic music training. These techniques allow performers to improve their coordination and develop accuracy through repetitive daily exercises. Musical techniques progressively build upon previously learned techniques. Scales Scales form the basis for other musical techniques. Student may study major and minor scales as well as modern scales, such as the whole-tone and octatonic scales. A scale consists of patterns of half steps and whole steps. These whole steps and half-step arrangements will be different for each scale. Scales are musical techniques that can help a performer to play faster and more accurately, and make learning new pieces easier. Chords Chords require knowledge of major and minor scales. Chords come in several different forms that affect the sound. Triads consist of three notes spaced a third apart and classified as major, minor, augmented and diminished chords. Seventh chords build on triads and have an additional no...